<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments: Examining Content Management Systems by Comparing Drupa ...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetbeacon.com/blog/2011-03/examining-content-management-systems-by-comparing-drupal-and-joomla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetbeacon.com/blog/2011-03/examining-content-management-systems-by-comparing-drupal-and-joomla/</link>
	<description>Comments: Examining Content Management Systems by Comparing Drupal and Joomla</description>
    <meta name="description" content="Comments: Examining Content Management Systems by Comparing Drupal and Joomla" />
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 02:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.internetbeacon.com/blog/2011-03/examining-content-management-systems-by-comparing-drupal-and-joomla/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetbeacon.com/blog/?p=981#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Taking the cast side, Joomla as a CMS appears to excel in elements that can be articular as functional, while Drupal succeeds in the architectural elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking the cast side, Joomla as a CMS appears to excel in elements that can be articular as functional, while Drupal succeeds in the architectural elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
